Skip to content

Skewed Distributions

Imagine a plot showing the distribution of the income variable, with incomes ranging from about $10,000 to $90,000. The bars representing frequencies form a bell-shaped curve, but it's not perfectly symmetrical. Instead, there's a noticeable long tail stretching towards the higher end of the income range, creating an asymmetrical shape.

Accompanying this visualization, you have a table displaying the mean income as $34,795 and the standard deviation as $11,971. These statistics give you a numerical snapshot of the data's central tendency and spread.

Income Distribution
codecademy.com
Income Distribution

Recognizing Skewness

As you compare this income distribution to other variables, like age, you'll notice differences in shape. Specifically, the income distribution has quite a few musicians with higher incomes, resulting in a longer tail on the right side. This observation tells you that the income data is skewed.

A skewed distribution is one that isn't symmetrical. It has a steep change in frequency on one side and a flatter, trailing change on the other. In this case, the income distribution is right-skewed (or positively skewed) because the tail extends to the right.

Interpreting the Mean in Skewed Distributions

When you look at the mean income of $34,795, it might seem a bit high, especially if most of the incomes appear to fall between $15,000 and $40,000. This apparent discrepancy arises because the mean is sensitive to extreme values. The mean is calculated by summing all the incomes and dividing by the total number of observations. In a skewed distribution, higher incomes in the right tail inflate this sum, pushing the mean higher than where most of the data lies.

In skewed distributions, the mean might not accurately represent a typical observation. This is a crucial insight for data analysis, as relying solely on the mean can lead to misinterpretations of the data.

Dealing with Skewed Data

To address the issue of skewness, you can consider alternative measures of central tendency. Here are a few approaches:

  1. Median: The median represents the middle value when all the incomes are ordered from lowest to highest. It's less affected by extreme values and often provides a better indication of a typical income in a skewed distribution.

  2. Mode: The mode is the most frequently occurring value in your dataset. While it might not always be useful for continuous data like income, it can sometimes offer insights into common values.

  3. Transformations: Applying transformations, such as logarithmic or square root transformations, can sometimes help normalize the distribution, making it more symmetrical and easier to analyze.

  4. Trimming: Excluding extreme values (outliers) can provide a clearer picture of the central tendency for the bulk of your data.

Conclusion

Understanding the shape of your data distribution is crucial for accurate analysis. In the case of income, recognizing the right-skewed nature of the distribution helps explain why the mean might not be the best measure of central tendency. By considering alternative measures like the median or applying data transformations, you can gain a more accurate and meaningful understanding of your data. This nuanced approach ensures that your analysis reflects the true characteristics of the dataset, leading to more reliable and insightful conclusions.